<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>IT Security on Pfisterer Consulting</title><link>https://pfisterer.xyz/en/tags/it-security/</link><description>Recent content in IT Security on Pfisterer Consulting</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 07:00:00 +0200</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://pfisterer.xyz/en/tags/it-security/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Six Hours, Eighteen Years: What NGINX Rift Tells the Mittelstand</title><link>https://pfisterer.xyz/en/news/nginx-rift-18-jahre-ki-audit-mittelstand/</link><pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2026 07:00:00 +0200</pubDate><guid>https://pfisterer.xyz/en/news/nginx-rift-18-jahre-ki-audit-mittelstand/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;On May 13, 2026, F5 and security researcher depthfirst publish a disclosure with weight behind it. CVE-2026-42945, codenamed &lt;strong&gt;NGINX Rift&lt;/strong&gt;, CVSS 9.2. Unauthenticated remote code execution in the &lt;code&gt;ngx_http_rewrite_module&lt;/code&gt; of NGINX. Affected: all open-source versions from 0.6.27 through 1.30.0 and NGINX Plus R32 through R36. The bug has been in the code since 2008. Eighteen years.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The actual punchline sits in the disclosure footnote. The bug was not found by a human researcher. It was found by an autonomous AI analysis system. Six hours of runtime against one of the most thoroughly reviewed open-source codebases on the planet. This is the direct confirmation of the thesis I sketched on May 13 in the article on the &lt;a href="https://pfisterer.xyz/en/news/claude-mythos-firefox-glasswing-mittelstand/"&gt;Mythos Glasswing asymmetry&lt;/a&gt; as something coming. It arrived a week later.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>The Glasswing Asymmetry: What Mythos Finds in Firefox and What the Mittelstand Should Learn</title><link>https://pfisterer.xyz/en/news/claude-mythos-firefox-glasswing-mittelstand/</link><pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 07:00:00 +0200</pubDate><guid>https://pfisterer.xyz/en/news/claude-mythos-firefox-glasswing-mittelstand/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;On May 5, 2026, Mozilla publishes an unusually candid blogpost: An early version of Anthropic&amp;rsquo;s newest model, Claude Mythos Preview, has found 271 security vulnerabilities in Firefox over the past weeks. 180 high-severity, 80 moderate, 11 low. Some of the bugs sat undiscovered in the code for 15 years, meaning since 2011. Patches went out in Firefox 149.0.2, 150, 150.0.1, and 150.0.2.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That alone would be a substantial story. What makes it matter for the German Mittelstand is the footnote: Mythos is not publicly available. Anthropic currently hands the model only to eleven organizations under a program called Project Glasswing. The list contains U.S. hyperscalers, U.S. banks, U.S. security vendors, and the Linux Foundation. No German company. No European company outside Linux.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>When AI Agents Hack AI Systems: Why Your AI Needs Security Testing Now</title><link>https://pfisterer.xyz/en/news/ki-agenten-hacken-ki-systeme-sicherheit-pruefung/</link><pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2026 08:00:00 +0100</pubDate><guid>https://pfisterer.xyz/en/news/ki-agenten-hacken-ki-systeme-sicherheit-pruefung/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;An autonomous AI agent chains four individually harmless vulnerabilities into a complete platform takeover — severity rating CVSS 9.8 out of 10. Then it gives itself a voice and calls the target system&amp;rsquo;s AI. No human hacker. No sophisticated exploit kit. One AI hacking another AI.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This isn&amp;rsquo;t science fiction. This happened in March 2026 — to a $20 million-funded AI recruiting startup whose clients included Anthropic, Stripe, and Monzo. AI security is a central aspect of my &lt;a href="https://pfisterer.xyz/en/leistungen/pflicht-themen/"&gt;consulting on compliance and regulatory requirements&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Inside OpenClaw #5: Production-Ready AI on WSL2</title><link>https://pfisterer.xyz/en/news/openclaw-wsl2-production-stabilitaet/</link><pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2026 09:00:00 +0100</pubDate><guid>https://pfisterer.xyz/en/news/openclaw-wsl2-production-stabilitaet/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Your inference server runs fine on Friday afternoon. You set the &lt;a href="https://pfisterer.xyz/en/news/openclaw-vllm-mistral-flags/"&gt;right vLLM flags&lt;/a&gt;, tool calling works, the agent responds correctly. Monday morning, the server is dead. No crash log. No error message. WSL2 simply stopped running.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This is the gap between &amp;ldquo;works on my machine&amp;rdquo; and &amp;ldquo;runs in production.&amp;rdquo; And it has nothing to do with code. Production stability of AI systems is an aspect of my &lt;a href="https://pfisterer.xyz/en/leistungen/ki-automatisierung/"&gt;AI and automation consulting&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Zero API Costs: How We Run an AI Agent on a Single GPU</title><link>https://pfisterer.xyz/en/news/openclaw-lokales-llm-ki-agent-ohne-cloud/</link><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 16:00:00 +0100</pubDate><guid>https://pfisterer.xyz/en/news/openclaw-lokales-llm-ki-agent-ohne-cloud/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;Most AI agents depend on cloud APIs — and every request costs money. With agent workloads, those costs add up fast: a single complex task can consume 50,000 to 100,000 tokens. Run that a few dozen times a day, and you&amp;rsquo;re looking at a serious monthly bill.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We took a different approach with &lt;a href="https://github.com/Kendo1988/openclaw"&gt;OpenClaw&lt;/a&gt;. Our AI agent runs entirely on local hardware — one GPU, no cloud dependency, no recurring API fees. Local AI solutions are a focus of my &lt;a href="https://pfisterer.xyz/en/leistungen/ki-automatisierung/"&gt;AI and automation consulting&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item><item><title>Shadow AI: When Employees Secretly Build Their Own AI Agents</title><link>https://pfisterer.xyz/en/news/shadow-ai-wenn-mitarbeiter-eigene-ki-agenten-bauen/</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2026 10:00:00 +0100</pubDate><guid>https://pfisterer.xyz/en/news/shadow-ai-wenn-mitarbeiter-eigene-ki-agenten-bauen/</guid><description>&lt;h2 id="the-new-shadow-it-has-a-brain"&gt;The New Shadow IT Has a Brain&lt;/h2&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Shadow IT has been a headache for years — unauthorized tools, private cloud accounts, rogue SaaS subscriptions. But Shadow AI takes it to a different level entirely. This topic is part of my &lt;a href="https://pfisterer.xyz/en/leistungen/ki-automatisierung/"&gt;AI and automation consulting&lt;/a&gt; for SMEs. Because this time, employees aren&amp;rsquo;t just using unapproved software. They&amp;rsquo;re building intelligent workflows that actively process, analyze, and redistribute company data.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And they&amp;rsquo;re doing it with the best of intentions.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>